ESG Ratings Agency Alignment

How ZDHC data maps to major rating methodologies and disclosure frameworks.

ZDHC Data Meets ESG Ratings

ESG rating agencies and disclosure frameworks increasingly assess how companies manage chemical risk, pollution, and supply chain environmental performance. Two core ZDHC data exports — Performance InCheck (chemical inventory conformance) and ClearStream (wastewater quality) — address up to 4-6 distinct rating criteria across frameworks.

Global PFAS & Effluent Highlights

ZDHC MetricMSCISustainalyticsS&P CSAMoody'sBloombergCDP
MRSL Conformance
Gateway + InCheck
Toxic Emissions & WasteEmissions, Effluents & WasteProduct Stewardship; Waste & PollutantsWaste & PollutionHazardous waste / chemicalsPollution-related indicators
Wastewater pass-rate
ClearStream
Water StressWater Use - Supply chainWater; Waste & PollutantsWater management; Nature capitalEmissions to waterW1.2 / E2 - water pollution
Supplier-to-Zero
Maturity level
Supply-chain labourHuman Rights - Supply chainSupply-chain managementResponsible productionGovernance pillarDue diligence disclosure
Corrective actions closedESG ControversiesIncidents / managementMSA / EventsEvent impactN/AProcess indicators
Public disclosure
Detox.Live
Transparency sectionN/ATransparency & ReportingTransparencyDisclosureTransparency

Practical Applications for Investors

  • Due diligence

    Request Gateway registration status, InCheck conformance levels, and ClearStream pass rates for target companies.

  • Portfolio monitoring

    Track MRSL conformance progression (Level 1 → 2 → 3) and wastewater performance trends as leading indicators.

  • LP reporting

    Use metrics for fund-level KPls (e.g., % of portfolio with ZDHC-aligned suppliers).

  • Engagement

    Focus on supplier onboarding to Gateway and InCheck reporting requirements.

Case Study: MSCI Rating Progression

One Chinese brand collaborating with ZDHC to implement chemical management improvements saw its MSCI ESG Rating progress from B (2023) to A (2025).

Its Chemical Safety Score increased from 1.2 to 4.6 over the same period, providing rating analysts with verifiable evidence of proactive risk management.